<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To Blog or Not to Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stagecoachdesigns.com/blog/2008/08/webdev/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stagecoachdesigns.com/blog/2008/08/webdev/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/</link>
	<description>Managing Your Business Online</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://www.stagecoachdesigns.com/blog/2008/08/webdev/to-blog-or-not-to-blog/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stagecoachdesigns.com/blog/?p=100#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I actually agree with you, Rodrigo! Content relevance is too often overlooked by those just wanting to pound the content in.

There are different levels of ideal keyword saturation for different content types, but I agree that seo and optimized content in general should be directly relevant to your target audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agree with you, Rodrigo! Content relevance is too often overlooked by those just wanting to pound the content in.</p>
<p>There are different levels of ideal keyword saturation for different content types, but I agree that seo and optimized content in general should be directly relevant to your target audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
